Taha Baadi vs Facundo Mena Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Facundo Mena outperforms Taha Baadi in second serve points, with Mena at 45.55% and Baadi at 44.70%. Could this marginal edge influence the outcome?
• When it comes to returning second serves, Taha Baadi demonstrates better skills, winning 48.06% of points compared to Mena's 43.21%. Does this suggest a stronger return game?
• For first serve returns, Baadi again leads slightly with a 28.30% success rate over Mena’s 24.60%. Could this grant Baadi an additional advantage?
• Under pressure, Mena is more adept at saving breakpoints, achieving a 57.14% save rate, whereas Baadi stands at 50.78%. Could Mena’s ability to handle pressure be decisive?
• Over the past year, Baadi has won 49.12% of his matches compared to Mena's 42.86%. Does this hint at a stronger recent form for Baadi?
• Both players excel on hard surfaces, showing comparable career win rates, with Mena at 67% and Baadi at 67%. Which player will leverage their surface proficiency?
• Mena competes in higher-level tournaments (Challengers/ITF > $10K) more often than Baadi, who plays mostly in lower-level events (Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K). Does exposure to stronger competition favor Mena?
• Mena's opponents have higher average rankings (279.98) than Baadi's (381.47) over the past year. Does this indicate Mena faces tougher competition?
• If the match goes to a deciding set, Baadi outshines Mena with a 53% win rate compared to Mena's 38%. Could this indicate Baadi’s resilience in tight situations?

Editorial Prediction (October 2, 2025, UTC):

As the players prepare for their upcoming match, the recent statistics highlight some intriguing contrasts between Facundo Mena and Taha Baadi. Baadi’s superior skills in winning return points, both on the first and second serves, may give him a slight edge in dictating the play from the baseline.

Mena, however, shows a stronger ability to withstand pressure, as demonstrated by his higher breakpoint save percentage. This resilience could play a significant role during critical junctures in the match. Additionally, while Mena has faced tougher competition due to his participation in higher-level tournaments, Baadi’s success in deciding sets suggests a noteworthy mental fortitude.

Considering all these factors, Taha Baadi appears to have a minor advantage overall. His ability to turn around and capitalize on return games and his composure in deciding sets make him a slight favorite. Therefore, based on recent performances and statistical nuances, Taha Baadi is predicted to be the more likely winner of the upcoming match.